This Borrowed
Earth : Lessons from the Fifteen Worst Environmental Disasters around the
World. By Robert Emmet Herman
|
This Borrowed Earth features a compelling look back at 15
disasters around the world that had an unforgettable effect on the environment
and also the unsuspecting people affected. The author takes time to elaborate
his differentiation between environmental hazards and environmental disasters,
which is an important distinction. The former of the two results from natural
processes, like floods or tornadoes that occur over a relatively short period
of time. The latter refers to anthropogenic forces on the environment that
usually occur over a long period of time and without knowing the consequences.
Robert Herman provides a thorough and descriptive account on events ranging
from Minamata, Japan to the Love Canal in New York. While these events happened
in various locations around the world and within different cultures, the causes
are much the same. By chronologically covering these events, Herman allows the
reader to see how the causes and effects of these events have changed, or not,
over time. It’s a very informative recollection of how human innovation and technology
can result in disaster if not properly used or planned.
This book is far too descriptive and detailed for me to try
and sum all of it up in a short summary. But what I will do is rather make
connections between various events and hopefully develop a pattern on why these
events occurred and how they may occur in the future. One reoccurring motif of
this book was the negligence of those responsible for the disasters. The Exxon
Valdez oil spill resulted in thousands of barrels of oil spilling into the
ocean due to an inebriated captain. The exacerbated conditions that the people
in Seveso faced because the company involved failed to alert local officials of
a potential chemical explosion which later surrounded the community in a white poisonous
gas that caused Chloracne, as well as far more deadly conditions. This ties
together with another more apparent theme, which is trying to avoid blame.
Chisso, the chemical company in Minamata,Japan responsible for deaths and birth
defects for countless families, for over 15 years denied that their dumping of
thousands of tons of mercury into the local fishing waters was causing the
death and deformation in the community. They even went as far as suppressing
their own study that proved the related deaths and symptoms appearing in the
fishing village was due to mercury poisoning. Other companies like the Industrie
Chimiche Meda Societa Anonima in Seveso, Italy, in fear of facing blame and
potential lawsuits, withheld all information regarding the possible dioxin in
the air from their chemical explosion. This happened in every event at least to
some degree. Whether it is greedy corporations or ones own government, they all
seem to avoid blame even until the end.
In some cases, the resulting disaster didn’t come from corporations
trying to save money and knowingly endangering thousands of people with toxic
waste and chemicals. Some were failures of our own instruments, (and a bit of
negligence) as was the case at Three Mile Island, PN and Windscale, England.
Both of these events involved nuclear reactors melting down and the release of water
vapor in the form of steam mixed with radiation that was blown over numerous
towns that later caused numerous warnings on consuming food that had come into
contact with the radiation. In the case of Windscale, the government was very
slow in informing the public of what had happened, due to the fact that this
was a secret project (after WWII countries scrambled to obtain nuclear power
even after the events of Hiroshima). It took several days after the release of
the deadly radiation to inform the public that it may be endanger. To me this
seems like it should be a crime, the fact the government knew the chances that
this radiation would affect the local village and stood by, instead of ordering
an evacuation or any other feasible form of protection. But at the same time
announcing false warnings, or warning to early can have negative outcomes
(still far less than not ordering an evacuation). This happened with Three Mile
Island. The news of the reactor meltdown and potential radiation was leaked before
the local official could announce the current condition. This sent people into
a panic, trying to withdraw their money from banks, securing gasoline, and
various other things on the
“impending death” checklist.
There are to many events to be able to give adequate time to
all of them, but many of the characteristics of these events are the same.
Negligence and avoidance of blame are two major contributors to how these
disasters started and how they were made worse. In trying to save money
companies look for the cheapest way to rid themselves of their wasteful by products
that usually results in future generations paying for it. Governments sometimes
out of trying to avoid more chaos withhold pertinent information to local communities,
which again makes the problem worse. The affects of climate change are causing
us to look for cleaner and more efficient energy sources. Nuclear technology is
always at the forefront of this search, and this book is a reminder of what can
happen if we become careless and complacent with technology.
No comments:
Post a Comment